I have to talk about reviewing PC games again on this blog.
For a while I have tried different kinds of posts about the PC games I play. First I tried barely describing the game and then only have personal notes in a spoiler section. At first I had five reviews in a post, but I really wanted most games to have their own post. But when I tried that, the format felt too confined.
Then I changed to a format I used a few years ago, before I started doing the balanced reviews. A little more text and pictures, and sometimes a spoiler section with my observations. It was better, but I was still not satisfied. It felt like rolling back to an obsolete format.
I started reading my balanced reviews again, and it hit me how much I liked writing the pros and cons in the end. Not only was it fun coming up with those, I also felt I could often write more interesting pros and cons than many professional review sites. Typically other reviews just mention that the graphics is good and the gameplay is great. I usually tried to go into the finer details there.
A line about unique game features, things that might annoy certain kinds of gamers, balancing issues, about devices and mini-games, you name it. This is not the place to just jot down a few bland lines so the review can be published. This is the valuable stuff that I like to read at the end of game reviews.
I’d like to think you feel the same way too about these pros and cons?